tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3069349063312276662.post4169744731379476218..comments2009-08-21T15:09:03.321+02:00Robert Nasiadekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06721470947386818024noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3069349063312276662.post-90988047801729673192009-08-21T15:09:03.321+02:002009-08-21T15:09:03.321+02:00

Actually, right now I&#39;m much more for &quot;lite&quot; version of the site for screen-readers, mobile devices, etc. and full-version with all the fancy stuff.<br /><br />Regarding your arguments.<br /><br />a) True, that&#39;s why lack of JS shouldn&#39;t prevent you from accessing the content, only from manipulating it. Things like 5-star rating widget, box-folding, drag&#39;n&#39;drop

Robert Nasiadekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06721470947386818024noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3069349063312276662.post-76120321830567251632009-04-06T12:35:00.000+02:002009-04-06T12:35:00.000+02:00

i just stumbled upon this post when searching for info on JS support.<BR/><BR/>I think your making a very bad decision by abandoning non-JS browsers as your going to affect your clients far more than just whther 1% of <B>people</B> can't view the content. Search engine spides won't execute the JS, screen readers, etc.<BR/><BR/>This will make clients run for the hills because:<BR/>a) Everyone

Danhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04708228974404812017noreply@blogger.com